What are venture debt warrants and how do they work?

A venture debt warrant is essentially a stock option that you give to your lender as part of the loan deal. It grants the lender the right to purchase a small amount of your company's equity at a fixed price sometime in the future. No shares change hands when you sign the loan documents. The warrant is simply a contractual right that only becomes meaningful if the lender decides to exercise it later.

Warrants serve as a sweetener for the lender. They're taking on significant risk by lending to a company that probably isn't profitable yet and may not have substantial assets to use as collateral. In exchange for that risk, they want a piece of the upside if your company takes off. The warrant gives them that potential upside without requiring you to give up actual equity on day one.

This arrangement sits somewhere between a traditional bank loan and a venture capital investment. Banks don't typically get equity stakes. VCs get equity outright. Venture debt with warrants gives lenders a smaller, contingent stake that only materializes if things go well.

Three key variables determine how a warrant functions. Coverage, strike price, and expiration. Getting familiar with each will help you understand what you're actually agreeing to.

Warrant coverage refers to the size of the warrant, usually expressed as a percentage of the loan amount. If you take out a $2 million loan with 10% warrant coverage, you're giving the lender warrants worth $200,000 in equity at the agreed strike price. In practice, this typically translates to a small ownership percentage, often just a fraction of a percent of the company's total shares.

Strike price is the price per share at which the lender can buy stock when they exercise the warrant. This is usually set based on your startup valuation at the time of the loan or pegged to the price from your most recent funding round. Sometimes it gets negotiated to a discount if a new equity round is expected soon. A lower strike price benefits the lender because it increases their potential profit if your share price rises.

Expiration sets the window during which the lender can exercise the warrant. Most warrants last between 5 and 10 years. If the lender doesn't exercise before expiration, the warrant simply disappears. Most exercises happen during a liquidity event like an IPO or acquisition, when the company's shares can actually be converted to cash. If your share price never exceeds the strike price, or if no exit happens before expiration, the warrant expires worthless and no equity changes hands.

One important point. Until a warrant is exercised, the lender has no voting rights or control over your company. They hold an option, not actual shares.

Venture lenders include warrants in their deals because interest payments alone don't adequately compensate them for the risk they're taking. Traditional banks lend to companies with predictable cash flows, hard assets, and long operating histories. Venture lenders work with startups that have none of these things.

To offset this risk, venture lenders charge higher interest rates, often in the 10% to 15% range annually. But even at those rates, the returns are capped. If everything goes perfectly, the lender gets their principal back plus interest. If things go badly, they might lose everything. Warrants change that equation by giving lenders a way to participate in outsized success.

The math works at the portfolio level. Most startups in a venture lender's portfolio will simply repay their loans with interest and generate modest returns. Some will struggle or fail. But occasionally, one company becomes a breakout success. When that happens, the warrants from that single deal can generate returns that offset losses across the entire portfolio. Lenders sometimes describe this as finding the diamond in the rough.

This structure also aligns the lender's incentives with yours. A lender holding warrants benefits when your company grows, which can make them more supportive partners than a traditional creditor focused solely on repayment. They have a reason to root for your success outside of just getting their money back.

That said, warrants provide no downside protection. If your company fails, the warrants expire worthless and the lender is left trying to recover what they can from a struggling borrower. Warrants are purely about upside participation.

For founders, venture debt warrants create a tradeoff between short term ownership and long term dilution. Both sides of this equation matter when deciding whether the deal makes sense for your situation.

The immediate benefit is clear. You get capital without giving up equity at closing. Unlike a venture capital round where investors become shareholders the moment the deal closes, a warrant holder has no ownership stake until they exercise. You retain full control and your cap table stays clean in the near term. The dilution only happens later, and only if your company succeeds.

Even when warrants do get exercised, the dilution is typically modest. Most warrant exercises result in 1% to 2% ownership transfer to the lender. Compare that to an equity round where you might give up 20% or more of your company for the same amount of capital. If you're trying to extend your startup runway while preserving ownership, venture debt with warrants can be an attractive option.

But warrants aren't free. When a lender exercises their warrant, new shares get issued and existing shareholders get diluted. If your company grows significantly, a warrant that seemed insignificant at signing can represent real money at exit. A warrant covering $500,000 worth of stock could be worth $5 million or more if your valuation increases tenfold. That's $4.5 million in value flowing to the lender instead of staying with founders and early investors.

There's also a psychological dimension. Warrant holders have skin in the game as more than just creditors. Some founders appreciate this alignment because it can make lenders more patient and supportive. Others feel added pressure knowing that their lender expects growth to make those warrants valuable.

Warrants can work well for both sides of a venture debt deal when structured properly. For startups, they offer a way to secure growth capital while minimizing the immediate impact on ownership. For lenders, they provide upside exposure without requiring additional cash outlay.

Access to capital without immediate dilution

The most obvious benefit for startups is that you get funding without giving up equity on day one. The warrant only converts to actual shares if your company's value exceeds the strike price. If your business struggles or stagnates, you haven't ceded any ownership for that portion of financing. You keep more of what you've built during the period when it matters most.

Smaller equity cost than a funding round

Even in the best case scenario where warrants do get exercised, the dilution is far less than what you'd experience raising the same amount through equity. A typical warrant might result in 1% to 2% dilution. Raising equivalent capital from a VC could cost you 20% or more of your company. For founders focused on preserving ownership, that difference is substantial.

Cash infusion at exercise

When a lender exercises their warrant, they pay the strike price to purchase shares. This means your company receives additional cash at the moment of exercise. It's a small benefit that often gets overlooked, but it does provide extra capital right when a liquidity event is happening.

Aligned incentives with your lender

A lender holding warrants has reason to care about your company's growth, not just getting repaid. They benefit when your valuation increases, which can make them more supportive partners over the life of the loan. This alignment often leads to a more founder friendly relationship than you'd get from a traditional bank focused only on collecting interest and principal.

Warrants come with real costs and risks that both founders and lenders should consider carefully. The upside potential doesn't eliminate the downsides, and ignoring them can lead to unpleasant surprises down the road.

Future dilution is guaranteed if you succeed

For founders, the main drawback is that warrants take a bite out of your exit. If your company does well, the lender will own equity that could otherwise have stayed with you or been sold to later investors. You're essentially selling shares at today's price for a company you hope will be worth much more in the future. When your valuation increases tenfold, that warrant the lender paid nothing for suddenly represents significant value leaving your cap table. Everyone on your cap table feels this dilution, including employees whose startup equity compensation becomes less valuable when new shares are issued to lenders.

Warrants increase your true cost of capital

Venture debt isn't as cheap as the interest rate suggests. When you factor in the warrant, you're paying more than the stated rate. Founders sometimes focus on the interest percentage and overlook how much the warrant could cost them at exit. Running the numbers on potential warrant value at different exit scenarios will give you a clearer picture of what the debt actually costs.

Some warrants create cash obligations

Certain venture debt agreements include a put option that lets the lender sell the warrant back to the company for cash after a set number of years. If no exit has occurred by that point, you could be forced to pay out cash you may not have budgeted for. Not all warrants include this provision, but it's a term you need to spot and negotiate if it appears in your term sheet.

Warrants offer lenders no downside protection

For lenders, warrants only pay off if the startup succeeds. They come with an expiration date and can become worthless if the company fails to grow or runs out of time. Unlike equity investors who at least own something, warrant holders have no voting rights, no dividends, and no claim on assets. If the startup falters, the lender's upside disappears entirely while they're still stuck trying to collect on a loan from a struggling borrower.

Warrant terms are not set in stone. Founders with leverage can push for better terms, and even those without significant bargaining power should know which levers to pull. The warrant discussion deserves as much attention as the interest rate when you're comparing term sheets.

Push for lower coverage

Warrant coverage is often the first place to negotiate. A startup with strong metrics, a recent funding round, or multiple lenders competing for the deal can often secure lower coverage than the standard offer. Getting 5% coverage instead of 10% on a $2 million loan cuts your potential dilution in half. Even a percentage point or two makes a difference when your company reaches a meaningful exit.

Negotiate the strike price

The strike price determines how much profit the lender can extract from your growth. You want it set at your current fair market valuation, not at a discount to some future round. If a lender pushes for a lower strike price, recognize that they're asking for more upside at your expense. Hold firm on pricing the warrant at your last round's valuation whenever possible.

Watch for put options

Some lenders include a clause that lets them force the company to repurchase unexercised warrants after a certain number of years. This provision can create an unexpected cash obligation if you haven't reached an exit by that date. If you see a put option in your term sheet, try to remove it or extend the timeline as far as possible.

Ask about alternatives

Not every lender requires warrants. Some will accept a success fee paid at exit instead. Others, particularly established banks working with later stage companies, may offer debt with no equity component at all. If your company has strong revenue or is further along in its growth, you may have options that don't involve giving up any equity. It costs nothing to ask.

Review everything with legal counsel

Warrant agreements contain nuances that matter. What happens to the warrants if you get acquired? Can you buy them back if you repay the loan early? Are there anti-dilution provisions that could increase the lender's stake in certain scenarios? A good lawyer will spot issues you might miss and help you negotiate terms that protect your interests over the long term.

We've journeyed through the startup funding landscape, from friends and family rounds to the highs of venture capital. You've learned to time your raise, pitch with confidence, and navigate the complexities of term sheets. But securing funding is just the beginning.

At Brex, we know that how you manage those hard-earned dollars is just as crucial as raising them. Our startup banking solution gives you real-time visibility into your finances, helping you stretch your runway and make data-driven decisions. Pair that with our startup business credit card, offering rewards tailored to founder spending habits, and you've got a powerful financial toolkit for growth.

Remember, every successful startup story is unique. The funding strategies that worked for one may not work for all. But armed with the knowledge from this guide and supported by Brex's financial platform, you're ready to write your own success story. Whether you're bootstrapping or aiming for unicorn status, the path forward is clear: raise smart, spend smarter, and never lose sight of your vision.

So, what's your next move? Sign up for Brex today. Don't let outdated financial tools hold you back. By using Brex, you're giving your startup the financial edge it needs to thrive in today's competitive landscape. Our platform is designed to grow with you, from your first dollar to your billionth. It’s why 1 in 3 U.S. startups choose Brex for their financial needs.

Go forth and build. Create. Innovate. With the right funding approach and Brex by your side, there's no limit to what you can achieve. Sign up now and take the first step towards your next big milestone — and the many more to come after that. Your startup's financial future starts here, with Brex.